Skip to main content

Nav_Gauche

  • About Octopus
  • Case Studies

Logo

Nav_Droite

  • Tool Box
  • Training

Logo Octopus

Main navigation

  • About Octopus
  • Case studies
  • Tool Box
  • Training

Breadcrumb

  • Home >
year(s)month(s)

Assessment & Design (Feasibility)

Main treatment objectives
Required space
m²/person
Skills level
Design input flow
m³/day
Source of sludge
Local constraints
Technologies employed
Design population
persons

Construction

Capex / design input flow
USD/m³/day
Time construction and commissioning
week(s)
Type of output
Design life

Operation & maintenance

Real input flow
m³/day
Opex per real input flow
USD/m³
Resources needed for operation
COD Reduction
%
TS Reduction
%
Faecal coliforms reduction
Log reduction

Tool Box

Publish a case study
Compare
Compare
Emergency Faecal Sludge Management – Lime Treatment, Bentiu, South Sudan
South Sudan
Compare
Piloting septic tanks as a long-term containment and treatment option
Syria
Compare
IOM Decentralized Wastewater Treatment System (DEWATS)in the Rohingya refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh.
Bangladesh
Compare
Connecting the Revolution of Oeillets slum to the Nantes Métropole sewerage network
France
Go to the French Version
Compare
Baharka Camp Grey-water Treatment System
Iraq
Go to the French Version
Compare
ABR − Constructed Wetland −Ponds- Drying beds
Myanmar (Burma)
Go to the French Version
Compare
Anaerobic Baffled Reactor - maturation ponds
Myanmar (Burma)
Compare
Aerobic Treatment
Bangladesh
Go to the French Version
  • Show More

Solidarités International

Wash Cluster

Oxfam

CAWST

Borda

HIF

Elrah

Confederation Suisse

Footer

  • Legal Notice